Ten years on from the Iraq invasion it’s interesting to reflect how little things change in politics. As the rhetoric around Syria begins to intensify in its aggression towards a ‘monstrous dictator’, the parallels with Iraq and Saddam are plain to see. I spoke out against the Iraq war at the time and I’m similarly worried over the Syria situation at the moment. I can only hope that the Government has learned the lessons of the past ten years.
In the clear light of hindsight, the decision to invade was an illustration of the problems that arise when politicians are not tempered by the restraining influences of management discipline and accountability. Certainly, an undeniably dangerous man was prevented from causing further harm to his own people, and Mr Blair would have us believe that this in itself justifies almost anything. But I think it’s the case that ‘he doth protest too much’. Ten years later it’s clear that Iraq is still far from a haven of peace and democracy, and the balance of power in the region has shifted alarmingly, as a direct result of our actions. We’ve seen Iran come to the fore in recent years, now that Iraq’s been removed as a counter-balance. And while it’s clear that Saddam’s so-called weapons of mass destruction were of no real consequence, the Iranian nuclear programme seems to go from strength to strength.
It’s a worrying development and, as I say, it’s indicative of the lack of discipline and accountability in the Government of the time. Blair and Co gave no thought to the end game. As became clear, there were no post-victory arrangements in place – nothing had been thought through as methodically as it should have been. But then again, the decision to invade was never really based on pragmatism or reason at all. It was a decision based on ego. We should have seen it coming in Mr Blair’s early references to the “hand of history” on his shoulder. He was a man ever with one eye on his future biographies. The chance to topple a violent dictator was simply too irresistible in that regard – so irresistible, in fact, that it even justified the hoodwinking of Parliament, Dodgy Dossiers et al. Frankly, it’s a disgrace that the simplest of management procedures found in businesses up and down the country weren’t in place. You couldn’t get away with such a laissez-faire attitude in the real world so why was it that basic principles of accountability and discipline were missing in the previous Government? And why is it that those principles are still lacking in the current Government?
Because there’s a lesson here for Mr Cameron. The UK and the Middle-East is feeling the consequences of a rushed decision that came about because the Labour Government lacked the management discipline that should have halted the process when the lack of planning became evident. Time and again myself and others have tried to remind David Cameron that ‘management’ is not a dirty word – it’s an integral part of proper Government. And time and again we’ve seen the co-alition make mistakes that could have been sorted out by proper management. There was a poll published today that showed people’s trust in Parliament is at an all-time low. Frankly, that shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone. Is it any surprise that people don’t trust politicians after the years of lies that Labour spun? And is it any surprise that people have no faith when the co-alition keeps demonstrating that it lacks the basic competence to see its policies through? When I’m away from Westminster and people ask me what I do I’m often tempted to tell them that I play the piano at a strip club. It is, after all, a more respected profession than being a politician at the moment. And that’s no joke. The Government needs to learn from the mistakes of its predecessors. It’s time to dampen the egos and think a little more about outcomes. Only then will we see public trust begin to return.
Blair should have been put on trial.
ReplyDeleteCameron (heir to Blair) is a total idiot that has learnt nothing from Labour's mistakes - he even continues them, showing his absolute contempt for traditional Tory supporters.
The Lib Dems are liars and are only interested in 'democracy, fairness, correctness' etc providing it doesn't involve them - they assume to be above whatever is appropriate for the masses.
The whole lot of untrustworthy political parties and MP's need to be swept away for something better which is a highly dangerous position for the UK to be in.
The EU is corrupt, undemocratic and is strangling every country that has any involvement with it. The longer this situation continues the more violent the backlash will be.
UK citizens were hopeful that the Tory government could have resolved some of Labour's mess but they have been bitterly dissapointed with this coalition government (where Torys once HAD the upper-hand - but no longer).
Their chances (and ours) have been thrown away because Cameron and Co are not traditional Torys they are in the mould of Heath, Hesletine, Clarke etc 'liberals' who started the recent decades of decline of our country.
Change will come and it will be dramatic & dangerous when it arrives but it is going to take several more years and an even worse financial situation to get to that point in time. In the meantime this country sinks further into the mire and current politicians with very few exceptions are not respected or trusted by voters.
Vote UKIP
Well said Laura – but worryingly readers’ comments (as published by the Daily Mail) do not support her
ReplyDeleteLaura Perrins the stay-at-home mum who mauled Clegg on radio: One woman speaks up for mums who stop work to raise a family telling the Deputy PM, 'ministers think they're worthless'
Childcare costs are incurred whether at home or in the nursery; effectively the working parent pays their stay-at-home partner (perhaps this will have to be done in a more formal way to enable proof of employment!).
Government subsidies for formal childcare have inflated prices for several years making them less affordable for those who do not receive government help – the squeezed middle.
Most mums may prefer to stay at home looking after their children but most have to work in order to have an adequate family income. In recent years mortgages need two incomes to support family life rather than only one. House prices doubled within 5 years during the last Labour government because of increased demand and shortage of supply.
Successive governments have undervalued the worth of stay-at-home parents whilst financially supporting single mothers & looser relationships. Government policies directly supportive of a more liberal society have had the effect of increasing the likelihood of relationship breakdowns which has resulted in the decline of stable family units & has brought with it increased social costs incurred by governments dealing with the many problems caused & thus creating the need for further taxation & housing.
The point is; if governments continue to discriminate against stay-at-home parents & provide increasingly generous benefit schemes (even to couples earning up to £300K) then there will be a massive need for further taxation – like the socialist government in France has found, financially that doesn’t work. Wealth creators leave the country, businesses flounder & unemployment rises.
A desperate last ditch attempt by the Tories to win the 2015 election – but I have no doubt Labour would be worse!
ReplyDeleteJust as putting 20% government (taxpayer’s) money into childcare is wrong and inflationary so is putting 20% into mortgage lending
The relationship between governments and banks was too cosy for too long. Housing became too expensive because demand increased through broken liberal relationships and mass immigration coupled with supply shortages – the UK has not been building sufficient housing for years.
As housing prices escalated (which they did so dramatically under the last Labour government) banks were encouraged to alter their traditional parameters for mortgage lending to encompass one and a half or even two salaries into the equation. People were enabled to take on more debt than was prudent and as they did so prices continued to escalate. But this traps many households into both having to continue working even once children are on the scene and some parents would prefer not be working. Being financially trapped introduces pressures into the relationship which can result in divorce/separation particularly when governments financially assist single parents.
The inability of first-time buyers to buy a home is a social problem and governments are desperate to "help" people buy houses because they feel this will buy them votes. But allowing people to borrow more is not the answer; the fundamental problem is the shortage of supply. Supply needs to be increased substantially to enable prices to eventually come back down to affordable levels. A feel-good house price boom is used by desperate governments in the hope of winning elections, Labour tried it and now the Tory’s are going to try it.
The Bank of England has already propped up the housing market with its QE and the lowest Bank Rates in living memory; helping borrowers but punishing savers. Now George Osborne’s ‘Help to Buy’ programme announced in the recent Budget offers loans up to 20% of the value of the property up to £600K and a mortgage guarantee for first-time buyers.
Using tax-payers money the government is moving into an area that the FSA has already deemed risky for mainstream lenders in which it has required banks to hold more capital. As Matthew Sinclair, of the Taxpayers’ Alliance has said, people would be able to take out home loans knowing ‘the government will bail them out’. Putting the taxpayer on the hook for what are effectively sub-prime loans is very dangerous.
A responsible, government encouraged, house building scheme is absolutely necessary in the UK to correct current imbalances but this needs to be managed sympathetically rather than allowing green belts to shrink or disappear. However this course of action together with government backed lending and a deliberately more relaxed attitude to inflation looks dangerously like another boom brewing which no doubt will be followed by yet another bust!
VOTE UKIP
Peter Hitchens is absolutely spot on..........
ReplyDelete'Mr Slippery set up the original Leveson Inquiry in a short-sighted attempt to look good'. He stuffed it full of liberal types and, 'by the time he realised he had created a great clanking, devouring monster, it was too late to stop'.
The man was and is a fool but even he became concerned by the committees suggestions. 'So he pretended that he would prevent the Leveson report from turning into state regulation of the press. Then he realised that he couldn’t, so he disguised his defeat as a decisive act of strength. That was when he abruptly halted the talks in which he was being wrestled to the ground by the press-hating lobby of spiteful, short-sighted leftists and vengeful celebrities.
Finally, he was responsible for what will come to be seen as one of the stupidest and most shameful moments in British political history'.
What an idiot!
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2298197/PETER-HITCHENS-Fight-freedom-Duvet-Dave-bed.html#ixzz2OTMjmja8
How many PCC assistants are we up to for Northamptonshire now?
ReplyDeleteIs it some kind of UK record?
HESELTINE – ANOTHER TORY FOOL
ReplyDeleteHESELTINI ! Strewth! I thought/ hoped he was long gone. Did we not once have this. Before he and his europhile acolytes arose and trashed it. And now he can't even play dead properly.
- bedford , Leighton Buzzard, 25/3/2013 12:11
...........LEFT......LEFT........LEFT.............EAST........EAST.........EAST.........WE CONTINUE EVER EASTWARDS.......TOWARDS FEDERALISM........WHERE THE COMMON DENOMINATOR..........IS POVERTY...........................CAPS. AS VIS. IMPAIRED
- LEN , PERTHSHIRE, 25/3/2013 13:50
The gigantic ego this man has is Titanic , he affected the direction this Country was heading in , by stabbing Margaret Thatcher in the back , and betraying this country . The rest is history .
- John-B , London, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 14:25
What idiotic rubbish ... The reason we are failing in the west is due to our inability to stop wealth flowing to poorer country's .... We cannot continue to bleed money abroad and support others
- David , Winchester England, 25/3/2013 14:12
There's no fool like an old fool - but I don't suppose we can say that now in our 'liberal' society!
- Fiona , Northampton, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 14:11
The short term safety net has become a lifestyle for many people.
- Mr Ed , Up North, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 14:11
Benefits safety net too generous + taxation system too punishing = apathy
- Fiona , Northampton, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 14:09
Too rich tory talking some drivel from his tory ivory tower.
- terence , derby, 25/3/2013 14:09
People have no incentive to work hard running a small business because of all the taxes that are taken, time you pay everying out you are left with nothing. Heseltine always was a ivory tower Tory,
- Lenny , London, 25/3/2013 13:58
Give us a level playing field ie no regulations , lower tax, no employment control, no outsiders owning British assets,th same rates of pay need not change but watch us soar. It is politicians or there civil servants who have trounced the will to go forward.
- Scrumpy , Tynemouth, 25/3/2013 13:56
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298624/Were-wealthy-care-economy-Britain-lacks-national-says-Heseltine.html#ixzz2OZ0wOZaw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Can a Conservative (if the party has any left) please remind David Cameron that socialism fails:
ReplyDeleteFrance has lost ONE MILLION jobs because of repressive tax regime as 60,000 of the country's rich now live abroad, report claims
By Ian Sparks PUBLISHED:17:18, 25 March 2013
This is what happens when you clobber the wealth of the job creators, They move away (because they can) and take their cash with them, result less money and jobs in the economy, simple.
- st, spain, Spain, 25/3/2013 19:32
The French will learn the hard way that socialism doesn't work....
- steve, winchester, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 19:50
French ministers are arrogant half wits. They declare the French business community as patriots and now they've all left they deny theyre leaving. Don't you love socialists, stupid to the last euro.
- Richard, Midi Pyrénées, France, 25/3/2013 20:03
If the wealthy left Britain where would the Socialists get their money from to finance their welfare schemes which the rest of European migrants want to get their hands on?
- alan, uk, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 19:28
Elect Red ED and Little Ed will get the same as France . Vote UKIP for freedom from EU.
- patchi, Chichester, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 19:29
This is where envy leads.
- jeff, worthing, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 20:00
vote ukip
- jabba825, birmingham, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 19:56
Labour did the same here in the seventies. There is no incentive for people to work hard and to become rich to be then taxed to the max to pay for those that don't. Socialists always assume that anyone that is rich became that way because of dishonesty or rich parents, that isn't the case. The idea of taking all the money from the rich to give to the poor just doesn't work
- Jay, Blackpool, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 18:00
Socialists hate those with money. Yet who employs people? Who pays taxes? Who keeps the economy going? Well socialists seem to think the answer to those questions is... people on benefits.Never never vote labour- please.
- highIQ, west midlands, United Kingdom, 25/3/2013 17:53
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298936/France-lost-million-jobs-repressive-tax-regime-report-claims.html#ixzz2OdUwp9Ho
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
GOOD CHOICE - THANK YOU OSBORNE!
ReplyDeleteHow DOES one live in London on £1million?
New Bank of England chief's wife blames influx of wealthy French to London for her struggle to find a home (despite £5,000 a week allowance)
Tweeted about the number of people fleeing France's high taxes
Linked to a story about how Hollande is scaling back taxes, adding: 'Maybe I'll be able to find a place to live in London after all.'
Mr Carney is set to take up the role of Bank of England governor in July
By Gerri Peev
He hasn't even started the job yet but it's already looking like a huge error hiring him with Marie-Antoinette.shooting her mouth off at every opportunity. Do we really want a Governor of the Bank of England whose wife is so extragavant that she finds a housing allowance of £5000/week inadequate?
- MattF, London, United Kingdom, 26/3/2013 2:27
'She also signalled she expected to take part in policy-making in the UK' - and what gives her the right to interfere in such an important PUBLIC institution. SHUT UP, WOMAN!
- Ian Wilson, London, 26/3/2013 2:35
Why is it self proclaimed socialists have no shame where money is concerned? Every time! LOL!
- Surrounded by fools, London, 26/3/2013 1:53
She should go on housing benefits - the local council will find her an appropriate property in Belgravia and for free!
- Cephas, Manila, Philippines, 26/3/2013 3:19
Obviously some pigs are more equal than others and cannot possibly be seen living anywhere near the riff-raff ! A very proper Socialist, she is, too !
- Ishkandar, London, 26/3/2013 3:56
Stay in Canada and take your socialism with you. Sounds like a disasterous appointment
- stereo, Europe, Spain, 26/3/2013 3:27
She should come back to Canada and face the consequences. They sold Vancouver to the wealthy Chinese so please dont rant about the French in London. You went to the UK because you couldn't earn that much in Canada. Canadians are not that stupid to pay such silly salaries like the Brits do. I cant even pay a 'large city' allowance to attract and retain staff in a way over priced city - who says so the government (because they dont do that sort of thing over here)!!!!
- sparky, vancouver, Canada, 26/3/2013 4:12
Good grief the woman's skeletal!! What about the house vacated by the benefits mother of 25 or something?
- gillgill, manchester, 26/3/2013 1:40
Keep looking dear, something will turn up.
- Broken, Man, Pitcairn, 26/3/2013 1:45
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299152/Housing-woe-1m-Bank-England-chiefs-wife-blames-influx-wealthy-french-London-struggle-home-despite-5-000-week-allowance.html#ixzz2OdTW4nRg
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
EVENTUALLY SOCIALISM FAILS………………THE EU WILL FAIL
ReplyDeleteBUT HOW MUCH DAMAGE WILL IT DO BEFORE IT DIES?
Labour, Lib-Dems and Torys are writing themselves out of the future by supporting the EU
The UK’s future is UKIP
The EU socialists are now openly stealing to prop up their empire……………………there is no limit to the amount of other peoples' money socialists can spend.
‘Now savings could be raided across Eurozone: As finance chief warns more EU taxpayers could be targeted after Cyprus, who's next for a brutal haircut'?
By James Chapman
‘One of the nastiest and most immoral political acts in modern times’
By Max Hastings PUBLISHED:23:54, 25 March 2013
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299078/One-nastiest-immoral-political-acts-modern-times.html#ixzz2OdltiiQk
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
UK IMMIGRATION OVERLOAD
ReplyDeleteTHE ANSWER IS SIMPLE – GET US OUT OF THE EU
But Mr Slippery is never going to do that, not on his watch!
Nor Labour or Lib-Dems
Migration crackdown - Mr Cameron said he was determined to fight those, including Brussels, who tried to block reforms. But critics dismissed the package as ‘smoke and mirrors’ – and warned they would do little to curb an expected influx of migrants from Romania and Bulgaria next year.
By Jason Groves PUBLISHED:22:49, 24 March 2013
It’s up to UKIP to save ‘Great’ Britain
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298561/Migration-crackdown-smoke-mirrors-little-curb-expected-influx-migrants-Romania-Bulgaria.html#ixzz2OduajdwQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
THEY'RE GOING TO BE KEPT VERY BUSY AND WILL NEED MORE THAN £2m!!!
ReplyDeleteOn 3 February 2013 15:06 I noted the following:
‘EU to set up euro-election 'troll patrol' to tackle Eurosceptic surge’
The European Parliament is to spend almost £2 million on press monitoring and trawling Eurosceptic debates on the internet for "trolls" with whom to debate in the run-up and during euro-elections next year amid fears that hostility to the EU is growing.
By Bruno Waterfield, Brussels 1:33PM GMT 03 Feb 2013 Daily Telegraph
What a corrupt waste of our money spent by the EU suppressing democracy – vote UKIP while you still can!
Just for a change, an article from the Telegraph in which their Political Editor & Steve Nickell from the OBR are of the same opinion as myself regarding George Osborne's mortgage support plan.
ReplyDeleteMORTGAGE HELP ‘WILL JUST BOOST HOUSE PRICES'
By James Kirkup, Deputy Political Editor 2:35PM GMT 26 Mar 2013
George Osborne’s £15 billion plan to underwrite mortgages and take stakes in new homes will drive up house prices without boosting house building significantly, Treasury forecasters have said.
The Office for Budget Responsibility cast doubt on the effects of the Chancellor’s plans to help people buy houses, which were the centrepiece of the Budget last week.
Steve Nickell, a member of the OBR, suggested that the impact of the scheme on the construction sector would be minimal. Speaking to MPs, he suggested that the primary effect of the Treasury’s schemes will be to push up prices.
“Is it just going to drive up house prices? By and large in the short run the answer to that is yes,” he told the Treasury Select Committee.
‘But in the medium term, will the increased house prices stimulate more house building? Our general answer to that would probably be: A bit, but not very much.”
Comments:
• Another stunning failure!
• Please everyone, contact Osborne and tell him about the sub-prime mortgage disaster in America. He seems not to know about it.
• Increasing house prices making the market even more overpriced and dysfunctional is what this self serving incompetent wants because he thinks it will buy the votes of homeowners. All down to electoral calculation, not good government.
• The stupidity of the £130 billion mortgage underwriting/banking profit subsidy was obvious to nearly every Telegraph reader commenting on the day of the Budget but apparently it wasn’t obvious to George Osborne or David Cameron (or the BBC or Guardian). This idiocy makes the Omnishambles Budget look good.
• Just what we need Gideon…..a mortgage bubble…..inflated ready to burst! Clueless
• House prices are too high, people can’t afford them; so let’s provide subsidies so that more people can afford them. The economics of the mad-house…in which we clearly now live!
• What an idiot! What a complete idiot.
• We have an idiot running the economy
I support traditional marriage...Coalition for Marriage
ReplyDeletehttp://c4m.org.uk/downloads/update1.pdf
If government 'help' for mortgages sends house prices up then it would seem highly possible that government 'help' for childcare does the same thing.
ReplyDeleteI've got an idea why doesn't the government stop helping the masses perhaps their situation would improve enormously!
HOW MUCH MORE STUPIDITY DO WE HAVE TO PUT UP WITH????????
ReplyDeleteWhat planet are they living on? As freezing Britain faces a grave energy crisis, ministers unveil more green gimmicks and eco taxes. What folly
By Christopher Booker PUBLISHED:00:10, 27 March 2013
‘Nothing better illustrates the insanity of the shambles our politicians have led us into than the fact that, just when we are closing down our coal-fired power stations in the hope of saving the planet, the Chinese are building 363 more of them, the Indians a further 455 and even the Germans another 20 - adding far more CO² to the world's atmosphere every week than Britain puts out in a year’.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2299607/What-planet-living-As-freezing-Britain-faces-grave-energy-crisis-ministers-unveil-green-gimmicks-eco-taxes-What-folly-says-CHRISTOPHER-BOOKER.html#ixzz2OkDQNTDJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook